Universal Pictures is moving forward with the international distribution of Alex Gibney's documentary on Elon Musk, titled "Musk," despite legal challenges from the tech mogul. The film, which runs for nearly four hours, is scheduled for a theatrical debut in North America on October 9 through Bleecker Street, with an HBO streaming release planned for early 2027.

Universal Stays Course on 'Musk' Documentary Release Amidst Legal Pressure

In a recent development, Universal Pictures confirmed its unwavering commitment to the global release of Alex Gibney’s extensive documentary, “Musk,” notwithstanding public and legal objections raised by Elon Musk himself. On September 17, 2026, sources close to the project revealed that the studio is actively planning the film's international rollout, a standard process for documentaries of this scale. The highly anticipated film, which delves into the life and career of the prominent tech entrepreneur, made its premiere at the prestigious Venice Film Festival. Following this, Musk voiced strong disapproval on X (formerly Twitter), labeling the documentary as a “hit piece” and asserting that it featured individuals with personal grievances against him. His legal representative, Alex Spiro, even threatened a defamation lawsuit ahead of the North American release, specifically citing text exchanges between Musk and a MAGA influencer, Ashley St. Clair, which are depicted in the film and touch upon the 2024 presidential election. However, film critic Owen Gleiberman, in his review for Variety, described Musk in the documentary as a "flawed technocratic visionary" and a "messianic opportunist." Despite the controversy, neither Universal nor Gibney has issued further comments, maintaining their position to proceed with the planned international distribution and the upcoming HBO streaming debut.

This ongoing situation highlights the complex interplay between journalistic integrity, artistic expression, and public figures' rights. The documentary's continued release despite legal threats underscores the importance of independent filmmaking and the media's role in scrutinizing powerful individuals. It raises questions about the boundaries of biographical narratives and the potential implications when subjects disagree with their portrayal.